Prompt I.A.: Mapeamento de oportunidades
Consulte meu e-book gratuito, A Arte da Experimentação: Da Ideia ao Produto — Inove com um processo simplificado e ajuda da Inteligência Artificial.
O prompt abaixo é refinado periodicamente. Não é uma versão estática.
Prompt
act as an expert product strategist and developer, adept at systems thinking, long-term vision, and generating functional code. my role is to perform deep analysis, proactive opportunity discovery, creative solution generation with detailed strategic and evolutionary assessment, and output a correctly coded, interactive html structure.
<INPUT>
1. **desired outcome:**
* `[insert your specific, measurable product outcome here. e.g., increase weekly active users (wau) by 20% in 6 months, reduce churn rate among new customers by 15% in q4.]`
2. **current product context:**
* `[describe the existing product/service, its main target audience, business model, key existing features, relevant architecture/tech stack, known limitations, strategic goals, market positioning, pertinent documentation summaries, etc. the more context, the better the analysis.]`
3. **key research insights (starting point) - these will be used as a foundation and explicitly referenced (✨). ex: '✨ john from acme inc mentioned (during usability test) frustration with report generation complexity, taking ~30 mins per report'; '✨ support tickets show 15% of new users struggle with initial setup (data from mixpanel)'; '✨ survey indicates design agencies desire visual proofing (n=50 respondents)'; '✨ api integration requests for quickbooks are common (mentioned in 10+ sales calls)'.:**
* `[list the main learnings you have. include specifics like names, user quotes, data points, frequency/impact where available.]`
4. **desired output format:**
* `[specify 'MARKDOWN' or 'HTML']`
</INPUT>
act as an expert product strategist and developer, adept at systems thinking, long-term vision, generating holistic solutions, and creating functional code. my role is to perform deep analysis, proactive opportunity discovery, creative solution generation considering multiple value dimensions and evolutionary potential, and output the findings in your chosen format (interactive html or structured markdown).
**goal:**
based on the foundational information you provide (outcome, context, insights, desired format), i will perform a comprehensive analysis. this includes:
1. identifying key customer opportunities derived *from your insights* (marked ✨) and proactively *discovering relevant additional opportunities* (marked 💡).
2. **evaluating all opportunities using evolutionary criteria** (detailed below) to assign an "evolution score" (2-6 points) and provide a **justification** explaining the score.
3. **ranking opportunities** based on their evolution score, marking the top ranks with medals (🥇🥈🥉). the `suggested target opportunity` will likely be among the highest-ranked.
4. for *every* opportunity, leveraging my full reasoning, creativity, and depth to *invent and brainstorm at least four distinct solutions*, explicitly **considering the nine value areas** (detailed below) to ensure holistic quality. solutions will be marked ✨ (insight-related) or 💡 (ai-generated).
5. providing a **clear description of each solution** and a **minimal functional explanation** (what it is, how it works conceptually).
6. **assigning and justifying the most fitting jobs-to-be-done (jtbd) growth strategy** for each solution, explaining *how the strategy shapes the solution's characteristics and differentiation*, using the detailed definitions provided below.
7. **highlighting which of the nine value areas each solution particularly addresses**.
8. **evaluating all solutions within each opportunity using evolutionary criteria** to assign an "evolution score" (2-6 points) and provide a **justification** explaining the score based on future potential.
9. **ranking solutions within each opportunity** based on their evolution score, marking the top ranks with medals (🥇🥈🥉).
10. outlining key assumptions for each solution.
11. presenting all findings formatted according to your specified `desired output format` (`MARKDOWN` or `HTML`), including all markers, medals, scores, justifications (strategic and evolutionary), value areas addressed, and specific insight details.
**nine areas for solution consideration:**
when brainstorming and evaluating solutions, i will consider how well they address these key areas:
1. **optimize functional outcome:** deliver the best possible functional result and performance for the core job, meeting key success criteria.
2. **optimize investment-value ratio:** maximize perceived value relative to the cost (money, time, effort). justify the investment required. achieved by reducing cost or increasing perceived value (benefits, quality, exclusivity, roi).
3. **create positive personal experiences:** build positive emotional connections through surprise, delight, exclusivity, personalization, storytelling, aesthetics, making the experience memorable and meaningful.
4. **reduce effort and sacrifice:** minimize difficulty, learning curve, setup time, transition friction, and perceived sacrifices (respecting prior user investments). focus on ease of use and convenience. effort can be reduced directly or perceptually.
5. **increase perception of achievability:** build user confidence and reduce hesitation via social proof, testimonials, case studies, clear guidance, reducing perceived risk, especially for new/complex solutions.
6. **reduce time to achievement:** deliver results faster or minimize the perception of time spent (e.g., through predictability, progress visibility). crucial when urgency is high or instant gratification is sought. time can be reduced directly or perceptually.
7. **maximize perception of time well spent:** ensure interaction time itself feels valuable, productive, engaging, or rewarding (e.g., through learning, flow, clear progress), justifying the time investment.
8. **offer autonomy with bounded options:** allow meaningful user contribution/customization (ikea effect) within a clear, simplified set of choices to avoid decision fatigue (paradox of choice). enable value co-creation simply.
9. **increase belonging, recognition, value:** foster community, facilitate user recognition, value individual contributions, enhance social connection, build loyalty.
**jobs-to-be-done (jtbd) growth strategy definitions:**
i will use these specific jtbd growth strategies to frame each solution's approach and differentiation:
1. **differentiated strategy:** serve unmet needs significantly better (performance, features), often at a premium. *differentiation:* unique capabilities for underserved users. *contrast:* not broad/cheap like dominant, not simple/accessible like disruptive.
2. **dominant strategy:** serve the majority better *and* often cheaper. aims to be the standard. *differentiation:* superior overall value (performance/cost) for mainstream. *contrast:* broader than differentiated/discrete; better core performance than disruptive.
3. **sustaining strategy:** incremental improvements for existing customers. maintains relevance. *differentiation:* keeps pace with market expectations; gradual enhancements. *contrast:* less radical than dominant/disruptive; less niche than discrete; less premium than differentiated.
4. **discrete strategy:** target specific, overlooked niches or criteria, excelling there, potentially accepting trade-offs elsewhere. often higher price in niche. *differentiation:* specialization ignored by others. *contrast:* narrow focus vs. dominant; different trade-offs vs. differentiated.
5. **disruptive strategy:** target over-served or non-consumers with simpler, cheaper, more accessible alternatives. often lower initial performance on traditional metrics. *differentiation:* simplicity, affordability, accessibility. *contrast:* prioritizes access/cost over performance vs. differentiated/dominant.
**evolutionary prioritization criteria (adapted for opportunities & solutions):**
i will evaluate each opportunity and solution based on its potential to "create space for emergence" using these two factors:
1. **potential for future leverage (products, partnerships, features):**
* *(for opportunities):* foundation potential for the ecosystem.
* *(for solutions):* building block potential of the specific implementation.
* *scoring:* low potential = 1 point | medium potential = 2 points | high potential = 3 points.
2. **potential for new use cases (intentional or emergent):**
* *(for opportunities):* enabling new applications of the overall product.
* *(for solutions):* enabling repurposing of the specific solution's capabilities.
* *scoring:* low potential = 1 point | medium potential = 2 points | high potential = 3 points.
* **evolution score calculation:** sum points from factor 1 + factor 2 (total score ranges 2-6).
* **ranking:** items ranked highest-to-lowest score. top ranks (🥇🥈🥉) assigned. same score = same rank/medal.
* **justification required:** provide a brief explanation summarizing reasons for the score, highlighting significant future leverage or emergent use cases.
**my analysis and generation process:**
1. **proactive opportunity discovery & origin tracking:** identify opportunities from insights (✨ + specifics) and generate additional relevant ones (💡).
2. **opportunity evolutionary scoring, justification & ranking:** score each opportunity (2-6), write the evolutionary justification, rank them, assign 🥇🥈🥉. identify `suggested target opportunity`.
3. **creative solution generation & origin tracking (min. 4 per opportunity):** invent/brainstorm diverse solutions for *every* opportunity, explicitly considering the **nine value areas** above. track origin (✨/💡).
4. **solution description & function:** provide a clear description and minimal explanation of how each solution works.
5. **jtbd strategy assignment & detailed justification:** assign the most fitting jtbd strategy, explain *why* it fits, and how it shapes the solution's *differentiation* and characteristics, contrasting with other strategies.
6. **value areas addressed identification:** briefly highlight the key areas (1-3) from the list of nine that the solution notably addresses.
7. **solution evolutionary scoring, justification & ranking:** score each solution (2-6) *within its opportunity*, write the evolutionary justification, rank them, assign 🥇🥈🥉.
8. **assumption identification:** list key assumptions (dvfu) for each solution.
9. **output generation:** check `desired output format` and generate the final output according to the corresponding instructions (markdown or html).
**expected output:**
***if `desired output format` is 'HTML':***
* **output:** a **single, functional html file**.
* **code correctness:** generated html/css/js will be syntactically correct, functional, standard practice (code doesn't need to follow lowercase rule). self-correction applied.
* **html structure:**
* main container (`#ost-container`).
* opportunity nodes (`div.opportunity-node`), prefixed with medal & marker (e.g., `🥇✨`). insight specifics included. `.target` class possible.
* clickable headers (`div.node-header.opportunity-header`).
* hidden details (`div.node-details.opportunity-details`) with evolution score & justification.
* hidden children (`div.node-children.opportunity-children`) with ranked solutions.
* solution nodes (`div.solution-node`), prefixed with medal & marker, nested. `.promising-solution` class possible.
* clickable headers (`div.node-header.solution-header`).
* hidden details (`div.node-details.solution-details`) containing:
* `<p><strong>description:</strong> [text]</p>`
* `<p><strong>how it works:</strong> [text]</p>`
* `<p><strong>strategy:</strong> [name] - <i>[detailed jtbd justification/differentiation]</i></p>`
* `<p><strong>key value areas addressed:</strong> [e.g., Reduces Effort, Increases Achievability, Offers Autonomy]</p>`
* `<p><strong>type:</strong> [text]</p>`
* `<p><strong>value:</strong> [text]</p>`
* `<p><strong>evolution score:</strong> [score]/6 (leverage: x, use cases: y)<br><i>justification:</i> [evolutionary justification text]</p>`
* `<strong>assumptions:</strong><ul><li class="assumption">[text]</li><li class="assumption">[text]</li></ul>`
* **css styling (`<style>` block):** basic functional styles (nodes, headers, indicators, hidden state, cues for markers/ranks).
* **javascript functionality (`<script>` block):** listener on `.node-header` to toggle visibility and indicator.
***if `desired output format` is 'MARKDOWN':***
* **output:** a **single block of formatted markdown text**.
* **structure:** hierarchical representation using markdown lists.
* **content:**
* main title (desired outcome).
* ranked list of opportunities (`-`), prefixed with medal & marker. insight specifics included.
* indented under opportunity: evolution score & justification.
* nested list (` -`) of its ranked solutions.
* each solution item prefixed with medal & marker.
* indented under solution (` *` or ` -`):
* `**description:** [text]`
* `**how it works:** [text]`
* `**strategy:** [name] - *[detailed jtbd justification/differentiation]*`
* `**key value areas addressed:** [e.g., Reduces Effort, Increases Achievability, Offers Autonomy]`
* `**type:** [text]`
* `**value:** [text]`
* `**evolution score:** [score]/6 (leverage: x, use cases: y) - *justification: [evolutionary justification text]*`
* `**assumptions:**`
* ` - [assumption 1 text]`
* ` - [assumption 2 text]`
* **formatting:** standard markdown (nested lists, bold `**`, italics `*`) for clarity.